Facing Reality / Last Call
(The bill for Ohio's - and the nation's - failure to head off prohibition legislation came due in 1919, when breweries were obliged to alter production or shut down, and saloons found themselves unable to satisfy consumer demand for long-cherished social beverages. For some the advent of Prohibition had a devastating effect; this excerpt from Over the Barrel, Volume One shows us how Greater Cincinnati reacted to the new order in its earliest days.)
Facing Reality
As Prohibition became a reality in Ohio, brewers
began to plan for a future without beer. In Cincinnati as elsewhere,
foremost among concerns was the potential duration of Prohibition,
and the likelihood that a given brewery could survive until the enactment
of repeal legislation. Some Cincinnati brewers-including several of
the largest-had little stomach for the battle, and quickly decided
to cease operations. Others sought a middle ground, in which they
would manufacture non-alcoholic malt beverages. A third group of breweries
opted to continue manufacturing operations, but with little or no
effort to follow the near beer trend. Many former brewers in the area
turned to the production of bottled waters and soft drinks, ice, ice
cream, denatured and industrial alcohol, cheeses, candy, and a host
of other products in an effort to survive Prohibition, in the hope
that the dry period would be short and malt liquor production would
resume. Regardless of the path chosen by the individual brewer, in
each case the unstated goal was to make the best of a bad situation.
As local brewers watched prohibition legislation become
reality in Ohio, they were obliged to plan for the future. The most
logical choice was to manufacture near beer, a cereal beverage brewed
by the same process as regular beer and subsequently reduced to one-half
percent or less alcohol content. Early sales figures brought guarded
optimism to the industry: the Bruckmann Brewing Company listed sales
of $83,389.80 in cereal beverages during 1919, compared with beer
sales-curtailed by midyear due to Prohibition-of $45,844.45. By 1921
near beer sales nationwide amounted to 285,825,830 gallons, in contrast
to real beer sales of over 1,000,000,000 gallons in 1918. Several
Cincinnati brewers followed the near beer trend for a time: Christian
Moerlein produced Chrismo until spring 1919; Wiedemann manufactured
Quizz; and the Crown Brewing Company came up with alcohol-free Tang,
a brew advertised as "The Most Palatable Cereal Beverage on the Market.
With a Taste and Flavor That Satisfies." Despite Crown assurances
that "It's the Quality That Sells the Goods," few consumers were convinced
that the product was a suitable replacement for familiar lager beer,
and Tang-not to be confused with the future orange drink of the same
name-had no lasting market success. Widely perceived as a weak cousin
to its predecessor, and overwhelmed by competition from homebrewers
and illicit producers of full-strength beer, near beer sales declined
continuously nationwide after 1921, and by 1932 fell to only 85,741,599
gallons. In 1925 only eight Cincinnati brewers continued to manufacture
nonalcoholic malt beverages, and of the local concerns only Bruckmann
maintained production of near beer until the end of Prohibition in
1933, thus becoming the only area brewery ready to provide beer to
customers upon repeal. Brewers everywhere made little secret of their
disdain for non-alcoholic malt beverages; nationally as well as locally,
many near beers were more noteworthy for their strange names than
for their taste. Monikers such as Bravo, Bevo, Becco, Cero, Gozo,
Kippo, Laxo, Mulo, and Singo, among many others, failed to excite
patrons throughout the nation, and seemingly were candidates for Marx
Brothers names more than for refreshments.
The reality of impending Prohibition took a tragic
turn for one Cincinnati brewer unable to cope with the sudden downfall
of the industry, when on March 17, 1919 William A. Boss, president
and treasurer of the Gambrinus Stock Brewing Company, attempted to
take his own life in the midst of a St. Patrick's Day celebration.
After lunch with coworkers, Boss accompanied several colleagues to
the brewery taproom and proceeded to take part in the festivities.
The thirty-two-year-old brewery leader had been in a jovial mood during
the better part of the celebration, but at one point suddenly excused
himself and returned to his office, where he procured a revolver which
had been stored away. Shortly thereafter a single shot was heard,
and Boss staggered from a nearby lavatory, with a bullet wound in
his left breast, before collapsing into the arms of a brewery clerk.
The clerk quickly summoned two other office employees, who helped
carry Boss to a table and administered first aid. Taken to General
Hospital after the shooting, Boss told doctors that he had shot himself
accidentally, but there was little question that the attempt was deliberate.
Before the arrival of the police, Boss had written a note-subsequently
turned over to a police lieutenant, despite requests by Boss to have
it destroyed-which read, "I am in the hands of my friends, and I request
Undertaker Sullivan to bury me from my mother's home." Further corroboration
was offered by Boss's wife, who implied that her husband had not been
mentally competent in the act: according to her Boss "worried over
Prohibition until he was nearly crazy. He worried night and day."
By late April 1919 most breweries had made their final
deliveries of beer to Cincinnati-area saloons. One local brewer announced
that it had maintained a beer stock designed to last until mid-May,
but increased demand had exhausted the supply almost a month before
the target date. Other Cincinnati breweries likewise were unable to
fill orders, and despite increased production of near beer were asked
repeatedly about the availability of real beer, distributed for the
last time several weeks earlier. Area breweries also began to cancel
leases on saloon properties they had maintained; in early May Christian
Moerlein filed eleven such lease cancellations with the Hamilton County
Recorder, under prohibition clauses written into many of the later
agreements with saloonkeepers.
In early May, the end of legal beer sales in sight,
other industries affected by prohibition legislation also began to
finalize operations. Breweries, wineries, and distilleries were the
most obvious victims of Prohibition, but a number of secondary industries
similarly were devastated by the legislation. Cincinnati coopers such
as J.M. Schott & Sons had gone several months without orders due to
the new law; in the case of the Schott firm a weekly payroll of $3,000
dwindled to nothing, as workers were laid off gradually until no one
remained. The Boldt Glass Works, a major suppliers of bottles for
Cincinnati brewers, shut down local operations completely with the
advent of Prohibition, and transferred remaining work to Huntington,
West Virginia, in a move to cut costs. The Progress Lithographing
Company, a Cincinnati manufacturer of bottle labels for area brewers,
like other companies was forced to convert its operation to other
uses in response to Prohibition and the subsequent decline in the
business of brewing. Throughout the city, equipment and machinery
manufacturers saw a noticeable dent in their sales figures, while
hop and grain dealers lost their largest clients. Labor interests
were also quick to point out the high human cost of Prohibition, when
thousands of brewery workers lost jobs. Brewmasters and other, often
older specialty brewery workers who had spent a lifetime of study
and practice in the trade suddenly were unemployed, forced to enter
a crowded labor market in which they possessed few marketable skills.
Yet saloonkeepers and bartenders, arguably the most scorned and abandoned
of those affected by dry laws, expressed less concern for their future.
A spokesman for the Cincinnati-based Bartenders' Alliance maintained
that many local dispensers of alcoholic beverages would remain in
business, through the sale of near beer and soft drinks, while others
who left the saloon trade likely would find employment in area hotels
and restaurants.
Many Cincinnati brewers chose a parallel path to that
of their colleagues in the related industries, and in the face of
an uncertain future opted to close permanently and take with them
what remained of their fortunes. In compliance with the Food Administration
edict, which forbade the use of grain to brew beer after December
1, 1918, the Bavarian Brewing Company produced its last batch of beer
late on November 30, although the company estimated that its 25,000-barrel
storage cellars maintained enough product in fermenters and aging
tanks to supply demand until May 1919. At the same time the Wiedemann
Brewing Company also stopped brewing, and announced that a planned
closure of its Newport facility would leave over 300 brewery employees
and 200 field agents out of work; a skeleton crew was to be retained-at
a cost of $25,000 per year-to care for equipment and property at the
plant. Wary of the cost of closure, Wiedemann management slyly opted
to keep the brewery open and produce near beer, at least until revenue
officers took exception to company use of the word "beer" on its near
beer bottle labels. The brewery quickly was closed and all shipments
and deliveries were stopped in late August 1919, the first in a string
of Wiedemann confrontations with the law during the Prohibition era.
On March 29, 1919 the Bellevue Brewing Company became the first Cincinnati
brewery to terminate business specifically due to Prohibition. Plant
manager George Osterfeld announced that remaining materials would
be transferred to the nearby Mohawk Brewing Company-of which Osterfeld
was president-but did not speculate on the fate of the thirty-six
Bellevue employees. The announcement echoed the sentiments of other
brewers that planned to close, namely that the manufacture of near
beer would not prove profitable, but with a long-term view of the
situation management chose to delay a final resolution on the future
of the company. Directors announced that the sale of Bellevue property
and equipment, valued at approximately $500,000 for the 50,000-barrel
facility, would be placed on hold until after the elections of November
1919, when Prohibition again was slated to be put to a vote.
Most notable among the Cincinnati breweries to fall
victim to Prohibition was the Christian Moerlein Brewing Company.
Well before the enactment of the Eighteenth Amendment, aware of brewery
sales losses where dry laws had been implemented as well as the possibility
of national prohibition legislation, Moerlein management took an early
step to enter the non-alcoholic malt beverage market with the development
of a new product, Moer-lo, registering it with federal authorities
on July 6, 1909. But a decade later, with Moer-lo a distant memory
and faced with a lackluster response to Chrismo in the near beer market,
company management quietly began to sell off stock, malt, and remaining
grain. Shortly afterward Moerlein management decided to close the
business and liquidate assets, and on June 1, 1919 brewery secretary
J. George Jung formally announced the decision to suspend operations.
Machinery, equipment, and real estate soon were offered for sale,
and by 1921 much of the famed Moerlein complex had been dispersed.
One part of the plant was sold to the A. Nash Company, a tailoring
concern, for $500,000. The Moerlein corporation maintained an office
on Elm Street until 1924, when what remained of the business was moved
to the Provident Bank Building and, for all intents and purposes,
disassociated from its famed brewing past.
By the end of 1919 it was clear that the end of legal
beer production had transformed the significance of Cincinnati breweries
to the industrial base of the city. Despite a late rush for beer before
the implementation of dry laws, brewery product value in Cincinnati
declined by 24.8 percent, or almost 2.6 million dollars, from levels
exhibited just five years earlier-despite the fact that the city still
supplied thirty-one percent of all beer made in Ohio-and stood in
sharp contrast with percentage gains exhibited during the same period
in traditional and future-minded industries such as meat packing (168.6),
foundry and machine shop products (231.1), and motorized vehicle production
and repair (314.9). Among major industrial activity conducted in Cincinnati,
malt liquor production was the only category which failed to exhibit
growth compared with a decade earlier; a decline in brewery product
value from $8,873,507 in 1909 to $7,789,700 in 1919 reduced brewing
from the fifth most important industrial enterprise in the city to
twelfth. Local brewery owners took some measure of solace in the fact
that the majority of citizens in and around the city stood firmly
in favor of continued production. But as both wet and dry advocates
soon found out, the demise of area brewing operations would transform
the nature of social activity as it had taken place for decades, and
force countless patrons unsympathetic to the new dry laws to seek
alternative sources for their beer.
Last Call
By no means was the effect of Prohibition limited to
the interests of beer producers. The saloon trade, once among the
most thriving of area businesses, likewise was marked for an early
death by anti-alcohol legislation. Long the biggest target of prohibition
activists, the saloon disappeared virtually overnight after the city
went dry, never to return in its previous form. A number of former
saloonkeepers tried to survive Prohibition in Cincinnati through the
sale of near beer, but quickly saw revenue dissipate when interest
in the product waned. Others converted to ice cream and soft drink
parlors, only to encounter a similar lukewarm reception. Many more
area saloonkeepers saw the writing on the wall, and sold their businesses
and property-often at bargain-basement prices-to those entrepreneurs
who would have them. The fall from grace of the Cincinnati saloon
was complete, yet not without a certain sympathy from the many who
never endorsed their closure in the first place.
As the May 27 deadline for legal beer sales in Ohio
drew nearer, the landscape of local entertainment began to change.
Although surveys showed that approximately 560 of the roughly 800
local saloons would remain in business after the beginning of Prohibition,
the number that served alcoholic beverages until the deadline was
considerably smaller. According to license arrangements most saloons
were obliged to close at midnight Saturday May 24, due to Sunday closing
laws and the need to purchase a special-and expensive, at $305-one-day
license to open on Monday, the last day before Prohibition. Thus in
many Cincinnati drinking establishments the twenty-fourth became a
day of sad revelry, on which thousands of consumers jammed downtown
streets and saloons, and shattered all previous records. Although
a small amount of beer remained available through the morning and
early afternoon hours, by evening much of the beer supply had been
exhausted, leaving consumers to purchase whatever alcoholic beverages
remained when they managed to find space at the overcrowded bars.
To the relief of Cincinnati police officials everywhere
the occasion for the most part remained orderly. Despite the huge
number of participants, arrests for intoxication were fewer than for
a regular Saturday night, as thousands of patrons partook of the last
legal beer with a decided air of resignation. From six o'clock p.m.
Saturday until seven o'clock a.m. Sunday area police registered forty
arrests for drunkenness, while another thirteen persons were taken
to General Hospital for treatment for excessive alcohol consumption.
Other consumers alleviated their frustration at the end of alcohol
sales by purchasing small stockpiles to take home. Local spirit and
malt liquor dealers reported that several million dollars in carryout
sales were registered before the midnight deadline, as Cincinnati
drinkers spent an estimated average of ten dollars per buyer to establish
private liquor cellars around town. But despite the orderly nature
of the farewell to the saloon, it became clear the next day that the
celebration had taken its toll. Cincinnati drugstores logged record
sales of bromos, aromatic spirits of ammonia, and other restorers
designed to combat the effects of overconsuming alcohol, while others
noted that an old favorite remedy, "a little hair off the hide of
the dog," made a brief but welcome return.
After the Sunday off-day due to closing laws in Cincinnati
and northern Kentucky-notwithstanding the discreet activities of a
select few Ohio establishments, whose "tilted lids" generated substantial
clandestine business-fourteen Cincinnati saloons and hotel bars anted
up the $305 necessary for a long last day of business. Despite the
large number of retailers who believed the business for the day not
to be worth the cost of the license, those who did open their doors
reaped substantial profits before the midnight hour. Many of the proprietors
estimated sales totals of up to $150,000 for the day; at the lower
end of the scale, two downtown establishments reported probable sales
of $20,000 and three others sales of $15,000.
Drinking establishments without cherished beer and
liquor proved unable to sustain the revelry of the moment. Numerous
Cincinnati saloonkeepers found that near beer and soft drinks were
a poor substitute for real beer, and in a telling display found that
patrons would seek out alcoholic beverages where they could be had:
In one famous place over the canal forced gayety was
the order of the hour, and the popular old drinking chanty was edited
and sung with fine fervor until the "merry" singers broke down completely
on the chorus and wept at the changed order of affairs, and hastened
in the direction of one of "the fourteen real ones" to drown their
sorrow.
The party continued unabated into the evening, as crowds
grew to say a final goodbye to the legendary saloon trade of Cincinnati.
Bartenders were found to be in short supply, as temporary bars served
the thirsty at the fourteen drinkeries, and hundreds of patrons waited
patiently outside for their chance to enter the crowded facilities
and place their foot on the rail of the bar for the last time. Chester
Park hosted its own unique celebration of the last day before Prohibition,
a wild party that featured a large assortment of loud noise-making
devices and a boisterous ceremonial funeral service held over a keg
of beer.
The final curtain came down on the wet era at midnight
sharp, when church bells sounded the hour around Over-the-Rhine and
downtown. While Chester Park revelers slowly sipped their last beverages
ordered before the midnight hour, others were not so lucky. After
hours of festivities at the Wheel Cafe, manager Fisher Bacharach mounted
a table and, waving a left hand stuffed with currency of various denominations,
shouted the dreaded final cry that the town had gone dry for good.
As other establishments quickly followed suit, Prohibition finally
descended upon the city: as one observer noted, "at 12:01 o'clock,
Cincinnati, famous as a 'wet town,' passed into the shadow of the
valley of ice cream and gingerale." Even as the local saloon trade
came to a boisterous close, some observers opined that without beer
and liquor to liven up the facility, area drinkeries would be hard-pressed
to match the success of their predecessors:
Cincinnati had its first taste of the new "dry saloon,"
a thing of pop and lemonade and ice cream cones and all that sort
of thing. Judging from appearances the change from the old order of
things was more drastic than pleasing, if wry faces were any criterion.
To see men line up at one of these thirst emporiums
and try to grow madly gay on a round of sarsaparilla was a pathetic
sight, such as has not been seen in this immediate vicinity [for many
years].
Local malt and distilled beverage consumers took solace
in the fact that the saloon trade continued in northern Kentucky,
albeit for only another month. In the initial days after Prohibition
began in Ohio, a steady stream of customers crossed the Ohio River
to drink. But in anticipation of hordes of Ohio drinkers descending
upon northern Kentucky, local judges and police officials sternly
admonished that they would show no leniency toward those who would
violate laws. Expressing a sentiment which echoed the thoughts of
many citizens-and a front-page Kentucky Post editorial-Newport safety
commissioner Dan Riedel threatened that city police would "fill up
the local jail with Cincinnatians if they come here and attempt to
put over any rough stuff," and mayor Andrew J. Livingston advised
that he was not prepared to accept "converting Newport into a dumping
ground for Cincinnati. ... The midnight and Sunday closing laws will
be enforced in Newport. There will be no foolishness tolerated." Under
the direct orders of Kentucky governor James D. Black, Campbell and
Kenton County law enforcement officials gave special attention to
Sunday closing laws designed to help keep crowds down. Thousands of
Cincinnati visitors arrived to find that the legislation indeed was
well enforced: on May 25-the last Sunday before the onset of Prohibition
in Ohio-no violations were recorded among 125 saloons in Campbell
County, despite extensive spot checks by dry agents, or anywhere else
in the region. The enforcement action met with strong approval in
the local media, particularly the Kentucky Post, which in another
editorial expressed admiration for efforts that stood in sharp contrast
to previous lackluster work:
For the first time in months, northern Kentucky experienced
a "dry" and peaceful Sunday. The experience, citizens report, was
most pleasing.
Girls, who on Sundays in the past, have been afraid
to take Sunday afternoon strolls, felt perfectly safe. There were
no "drunks" on the streets. There were no tough crowds hanging about
the saloons. The attendance at the ball games and in the parks, however,
was greater. ...
Northern Kentucky officials demonstrated that, once
they make up their minds to act, they can obtain results. We can forget,
if they continue to keep the Sunday lid well screwed down, that they
also demonstrated on the Sundays that have passed that they apparently
never made up their minds to act.
Yet on other occasions just before Kentucky went dry,
thousands made their way south, to enjoy a last festive moment with
alcoholic beverages. To the surprise of no one, on June 28-the last
Saturday of legal alcohol sales-saloons reported "enormous" business.
Covington police noted that arrests for drunkenness surpassed all
previous records but fights and other disorderly conduct were relatively
isolated. Newport fared even better, with reports that although city
streets were "jammed with crowds of merry-makers," officers found
themselves with little to do. After a day of quiet due to the Sunday
closing laws, on the night of June 30 Cincinnatians joined with northern
Kentucky residents long before midnight to fill the streets of Covington
and Newport, and pack saloons and cafes which continued to sell the
desired product. As had been the case in Cincinnati one month earlier,
all records for attendance, consumption, and sales-in some cases over
$20,000 on the last night alone-were shattered during the final wet
evening, with every saloon "filled to its utmost capacity with the
sons and daughters of thirst." Some were naturally downcast at the
arrival of Prohibition, most notably the patrons of the Old Kaintuck
Castle drinkery, who at midnight participated in a mock funeral procession.
But many participants elsewhere were in good humor; as the midnight
hour approached countless drinkers joined together in song, in a boisterous
rendition of "Tonight Is the End Of the World." Although extreme in
tone, the song fit the mood of many of those directly impacted by
Prohibition: on July 1 some 380 saloons in Kenton and Campbell counties
were forced to close, with approximately 1,500 employees on the verge
of unemployment. Among prominent cities Covington estimated a revenue
loss of $75,000 per year from the closing of its saloons, while Newport
expected a shortfall of $40,000 per annum.
The end of legal drinking in northern Kentucky marked
the beginning of the battle to enforce prohibition laws. While many
were content to drink until the last area watering hole was dry, others
began to stockpile beverages to take back to Ohio. Few were prepared
for a contingent of Cincinnati policemen and federal officers, on
guard at the Ohio end of each of the four bridges across the Ohio
River and empowered to search all vehicles for contraband. Some twenty-five
arrests were made for violations of the Reed Amendment, which forbade
the transport of intoxicants from wet states into those which had
been declared dry, before word of the searches got back to northern
Kentucky and deterred most subsequent attempts to circumvent the law.
Enterprising Cincinnati-area residents showed an early taste of what
was to come during the next fourteen years, and made arrangements
to store acquired beverages until a later date, or to ship cases of
beer and whiskey across the river by boat. Still others, entrepreneurs
with an eye toward fast money, loaded up trucks with whatever alcoholic
beverages could be had and acted as makeshift distributors. One such
truck was rumored to have carried beverages through Cincinnati the
day before, on a run to Toledo to stock up for the upcoming Willard-Dempsey
title fight.
The ghosts of the pre-Prohibition saloon proved slow
to fade from the sight of Cincinnati beer lovers, and provided a sad
reminder of bygone days. For some time after enactment of the dry
laws beer signs remained up, and assorted images from the heyday of
the saloon stayed in place for those not quite ready to let go of
the past. Other former saloons, which opted to close instead of offer
soft drinks and near beer, began to sell furnishings and prized possessions.
One prominent downtown Cincinnati saloon placed advertisements around
town to sell at auction many of the elegant fixtures, mirrors, bronze
figurines, murals, and cash registers that gave the establishment
its unique character. In addition the drinkery placed for sale two
paintings known to countless patrons, one a marine image valued at
$2,000 and the other, entitled "Ballet Girl," estimated to be worth
$1,000.
The question remained as to what should be done with
the former saloons when it became evident that no end to Prohibition
was in sight. As was the case with some breweries, many drinking establishments
tried to ride out the storm through the sale of nonalcoholic beverages,
albeit often for lack of a better alternative to pursue. A spokesman
for the Hamilton County Liquor Dealers' Association, which represented
saloonkeepers who sought to remain in business, emphasized that the
saloon served as a community institution beyond dispensing alcoholic
beverages:
The saloon is something more than a place where alcoholic
liquors are sold. It is a place of resort for thousands, and constitutes
a large part of the social life of the people. It is the people's
club house, the meeting house of the masses. The saloon in [that]
respect has a momentum, so that it will be projected as a place of
resort beyond the date when it would cease to sell alcoholic liquors.
Cincinnati saloon keepers, realizing this and confident that the people
want saloons to continue and will vote to have it sell liquors, intend
to keep their places going as soft drink dispensaries.
Nevertheless, on some occasions saloon property was
turned over to others with new plans. In northern Kentucky the popular
Crescent Cafe was transformed into a shoe store, as was also the case
with the Holtrup building, previously home to a cafe. To the gall
of longtime lager beer customers, the River View Cafe in the northern
Kentucky town of Dayton was shut down and promptly converted into
a place of worship, its original mahogany bar soon displaced by a
pulpit. But sometimes saloonkeepers refused to go quietly. In one
instance a Boston shoe and leather company attempted to occupy a Cincinnati
saloon site at 518 Vine Street, but was fought vigorously by the tenant,
William G. Brown. Brown, who recently had contracted with the Massachusetts
company for $9,996 per year for ten years, maintained that the lease
agreement allowed him the option to continue business at the site
for two more years. Other saloons, particularly those which had lost
their lease, made arrangements to vacate the premises in favor of
new, altogether unrelated business enterprises. A later reminiscence
by a noted Cincinnati writer spoke for the dismay that many felt with
the replacement of a favored corner beer dispensary:
I strolled over to that strip of Vine Street which
in the incardined days of old was famed wherever English and German
were spoken, as Over-the-Rhine. As I traipsed along that familiar
way memories came zooming from every nook and cranny of the towering
buildings to keep me company on my nocturnal hike. In those surroundings
I subconsciously began to acquire a thirst-a well-remembered, panting,
palpitating desire for a couple of hods of suds. The old pantry fairly
shrieked for beer! But alas and alack, there was no beer where once
it had ebbed and flowed as do the wavelets that lave the shores of
our dry republic. I glanced across the street at a building which
once sheltered the wettest spot on earth, barring the seven seas and
the Great Lakes. On the grimy window was a sign of white enameled
letters reading "Oompdedah's Dry Cleaning Parlors. Pants Prest while
you WATE. We make you look Knobby even if you have only one set of
Pants."
As contemporary observers made clear, the passing of
the Cincinnati saloon trade marked the end of an era in the social
history of the city, and the beginning of a period of uncertainty
for those who had inhabited the popular drinking establishments. The
once-lively saloon had been forced out of existence, but never strayed
far from memory among the many who had experienced the unique mix
of people and personalities which had given it a lasting charm. For
decades tales have resounded of the saloon as an integral part of
Cincinnati social life, and to date retain a universal charm and affection
which scarcely is matched by any other piece of the fabled past of
the city.
Read More Excerpts